HomeGSTGST Demand Stayed on Interest-Free Loan Between Company and Managing Director: Karnataka...

GST Demand Stayed on Interest-Free Loan Between Company and Managing Director: Karnataka High Court 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has stayed further proceedings arising out of a GST adjudication order that sought to levy tax on an interest-free loan transaction between a company and its Managing Director by invoking Rule 28 of the CGST Rules, 2017.

The bench of  Justice B.M. Shyam Prasad observed that the petitioner’s case required consideration in light of the CBIC Circular dated June 26, 2024, which clarifies that GST is not leviable on such transactions where no consideration is charged for processing, facilitating, or administering the loan.

The petitioner challenged the adjudication order dated December 2, 2023, and the appellate order dated November 14, 2025, passed under Section 73(9) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

The GST department had treated an interest-free loan transaction between the company and its Managing Director as a taxable supply of services. Invoking Rule 28 of the CGST Rules, 2017, the department assessed 1% of the value of the loan transaction as the taxable value towards alleged processing and other related services.

Buy Now: Litigation Guide For GSTAT : From Litigation Checklist To Procedure Guide Specially Designed To Carter Requirements Of CAs, Advocate

According to the department, the transaction between related parties attracted GST despite the absence of any explicit consideration.

Appearing for the petitioner, counsel B.G. Chidananda Urs argued that irrespective of the various legal grounds challenging the initiation of proceedings, the dispute stood substantially covered by CBIC Circular No. 218/12/2024-GST dated June 26, 2024.

The petitioner contended that the Circular categorically clarifies that GST cannot be levied on loans between related parties where there is no consideration received for processing, facilitating, or administering the loan. It was further submitted that there was no dispute regarding the nature of the transaction, which was admittedly a loan between related parties.

The Karnataka High Court issued notice to the respondents and directed the State to obtain instructions on whether the writ petition could be disposed of on the basis of the CBIC Circular itself.

Pending further consideration, the Court granted an interim stay on all further proceedings pursuant to the adjudication order. The stay will continue until the next date of hearing.

The matter has been listed for further hearing on July 8, 2026.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Invocation of S. 79 Despite Audit Closure and Absence of Fraud Allegation: Karnataka High Court Stays GST Recovery Proceedings

Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 4.5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

Madras High Court Quashes 2 Overlapping GST Assessment Orders Passed For Same Period

The Madras High Court has set aside two overlapping GST assessment orders passed for...

Madras High Court Quashes GST Demand and Bank Attachment After LLP Agrees to Deposit 25% Tax Demand

The Madras High Court has set aside GST demand orders and the consequential recovery...

GST SCN Issued After Repeated Audit Proceedings Stayed; Karnataka High Court Questions Jurisdiction of Fresh Action

The Karnataka High Court has stayed further proceedings pursuant to multiple show cause notices...

Invocation of S. 79 Despite Audit Closure and Absence of Fraud Allegation: Karnataka High Court Stays GST Recovery Proceedings

The Karnataka High Court has restrained the GST authorities from precipitating recovery proceedings initiated...

More like this

Madras High Court Quashes 2 Overlapping GST Assessment Orders Passed For Same Period

The Madras High Court has set aside two overlapping GST assessment orders passed for...

Madras High Court Quashes GST Demand and Bank Attachment After LLP Agrees to Deposit 25% Tax Demand

The Madras High Court has set aside GST demand orders and the consequential recovery...

GST SCN Issued After Repeated Audit Proceedings Stayed; Karnataka High Court Questions Jurisdiction of Fresh Action

The Karnataka High Court has stayed further proceedings pursuant to multiple show cause notices...