Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDevelopment Commissioner Vested With Power Only To Expand List Of Services Under...

Development Commissioner Vested With Power Only To Expand List Of Services Under SEZ; Madras High Court Stays Act Removal Of General Insurance Services

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madra High Court stayed the act of removal of general insurance services on the ground that the development commissioner vested with power only to expand the list of services under Special Economic Zone (SEZ).

The bench of Justice Anita Sumanth has observed that as per Instruction No.79, the Development Commissioner is vested with the power only to expand the list of services, the act of curtailing the list by removal of General insurance services from the ambit of the default list services, also appears contrary to the parent Instruction, being Instruction No.79.

Background

The petitioner challenges Instruction No.1/2024 (SO-MEZ) dated 02.07.2024. The Instruction touches on the contents of the default list of Input Services for authorised operations under SEZ. The uniform list of services to be followed in SEZ was the subject matter of Instruction No.79, issued in F.No.D.12/19/2013-SEZ, by the SEZ Division, Government of India, Ministry of Commerce & Industry as early as on 19.11.2013. This Instruction contains a list of 58 services in the annexure, where ‘General insurance business services’ figures at S.No.26.

The applicability of that Instruction has been continuing post the Goods and Services Tax era by way of a Notification issued by the same authority on 02.01.2018.

Expand List Of Services Under SEZ

There is a specific stipulation in Paragraph 4 of Instruction No.79 to the effect that Development Commissioners or Unit Approval Committees may expand the list to facilitate units/developers in their respective zones.

The Specified Officer of MEPZ-Chennai had, vide Instruction unilaterally proceeded to remove General Insurance services from the purview of default list of input services.

Read More: IT HARDWARE IMPORT AUTHORIZATIONS IN ‘RESTRICTED’ CATEGORY CAN NOW BE APPLIED FOR IMPORT AUTHORIZATIONS: DGFT

FAQs

Who can Expand List Of Services Under SEZ?

The Madra High Court in the case of Zoho Corporation Private Limited v Union of India and Others
stayed the act of removal of general insurance services on the ground that the development commissioner vested with power only to expand the list of services under Special Economic Zone (SEZ).

Which provision empowers commissioner to Expand List Of Services Under SEZ?

As per Instruction No.79, the Development Commissioner is vested with the power only to expand the list of services, the act of curtailing the list by removal of General insurance services from the ambit of the default list services, also appears contrary to the parent Instruction, being Instruction No.79.

Can Commissioner remove removal of general insurance services from the list?

The Madra High Court in the case of Zoho Corporation Private Limited v Union of India and Others
stayed the act of removal of general insurance services on the ground that the development commissioner vested with power only to expand the list of services under Special Economic Zone (SEZ).

Conclusion

The court noted that prima facie and insofar as the Instruction, based on which the list of input services has been notified, is issued by the Government of India, the assumption of jurisdiction by a Specified Officer to amend the same, is itself suspect.

The stayed the operation of the Instruction until orders and listed the matter on 30.08.2024.

Case Title: Zoho Corporation Private Limited v Union of India and Others

Case No: WP.NO.22132 OF 2024

Date: 01.08.2024

Read Order

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

More like this

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...