Calcutta High Court Constituted Committee To Look Into Claim Raised By Investors Of Company Under IBC; Patna High Court Refuses To Entertain Appeal  

Date:

The Patna High has held that the Calcutta High Court constituted a committee to look into claims raised by investors of the company under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

The Court opined that exercising jurisdiction by the Court only on the premise that the appellant is a resident of the State of Bihar would create multiplicity of litigations and lead to duplication of judicial orders.

The appellant is concerned with an investment made by him in different schemes floated by the respondent company-Alchemist Group of Companies company from 2012 to 2017. The appellant came before this Court with the writ petition and the Single Judge refused to exercise discretion.

Read More: Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Not Maintainable Against NBFC: Delhi High Court

The court found that the Single Judge had specifically referred to a similar issue, agitated in CWJC No. 281 of 2019 (All India Investor’s and Field Member Association vs. The Union of India & Ors.). It was found that the Calcutta High Court had appointed a committee to look into the claim raised by various investors of the respondent company. 

It was also noticed that there was an enactment made by the Bihar Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 2002 wherein there was a remedy available to the appellant. 

“We are not convinced that the said remedy under the statute would be efficacious, especially since the respondent is a company registered outside the State of Bihar,” the court said.

The court has dismissed the appeal and held that the appeal would not be maintainable. However, leaving liberty to the appellant to avail the alternate remedies even under the IBC, if it is still available.

Case Name : Ashok Kumar Singh V/s UOI & Anr.

Judicial Level & Location : Patna High Court

Case Number :  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5053 of 2019

Date of Ruling :  17/07/2024

Ruling in favour of: Respondent 

Coram:  Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran, Justice Partha Sarthy, Petitioner Advocate: Kumar Praveen

Respondent Advocate: Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13 Mr. Rajat Kumar Tiwary, AC to AAG-13 Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sushant Praveen, Advocate Mr. Saket Tiwary

Download Judgment / Order

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building. Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related