RTI Data Shows 5.4 Lakh Appeals Still Pending Before CIT(A)

Date:

In response to an RTI application (CBODT/R/E/25/00800), the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has revealed detailed year-wise statistics of pending and disposed income tax appeals before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] from FY 2021-22 to FY 2024-25, under both faceless and non-faceless regimes.

As per the data, the number of pending appeals at the end of FY 2024-25 stood at 5,40,041—a marginal decrease from the previous year’s backlog of 5,48,548. This includes 3,66,708 faceless appeals and 1,73,333 non-faceless appeals across various charges.

Key Highlights:

  • Faceless Appeals:
    • Introduced with the aim of bringing transparency and reducing litigation timelines, the faceless mechanism continues to dominate the appeal landscape.
    • Appeals pending under the faceless regime reduced from 4,34,411 in FY 2022-23 to 3,66,708 in FY 2024-25.
    • However, fresh filings remain high, with 89,328 new appeals filed and 85,828 disposed in FY 2024-25.
  • Non-Faceless Appeals:
    • Comprising Central, International Taxation, and ADDL./JCIT charges, these appeals showed mixed trends.
    • Notably, the ADDL./JCIT charge saw a drop in pendency from 85,843 to 68,737, despite a lower filing rate (7,554 new cases).
    • Central charges continue to witness rising pendency, crossing 91,924 cases in FY 2024-25.
  • Disposal Efficiency:
    • The disposal rate under the faceless scheme remains significantly higher than the traditional system, with a near parity between filings and disposals.
    • Non-faceless disposals continue to lag, particularly in Central and International Tax charges.

Systemic Implications:

The faceless regime appears to have improved disposal rates, but the consistently high inflow of appeals each year poses challenges to backlog reduction efforts. Legal experts suggest that while faceless appeals reduce subjectivity, more targeted structural and administrative reforms are needed to prevent the pendency from recurring.

Read More: No GST On Goods Lost In Transit: AAR

Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma
Amit Sharma is the Content Editor at JurisHour. He has been writing about the Indian legal market. He has covered tax & company litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and Various Tribunals. Amit graduated from MLSU Law College with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. from MLSU, Udaipur, Rajasthan. An Advocate in Taxation, and practised in Tribunals as well as Rajasthan High Court and pursued Masters in Constitutional Law. He started out small with little resources but a big plan to take tax legal education to the remotest locations across India and eventually to the world. His vision is to make tax related legal developments accessible to the masses.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Bohras in Parliament on Waqf Amendment 2025: Bohra Stand Explained! (Video)

The Waqf Amendment Act, 2025 has sparked major conversations...

Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 Simplified

The document outlines changes to the existing Waqf Act...

Direct Tax Weekly Flashback: 30 March To 5 April 2025

The Direct Tax Weekly Flashback for the period from...