Future Amendment Denying Depreciation On Goodwill Can’t Be The Basis For Reopening Assessment: Gujarat High Court

Date:

The Gujarat High Court has held that future amendment denying depreciation on goodwill cannot be the basis for reopening assessment.

The bench of Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice D.N.Ray has observed that the provision of section 43(6)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not amended at the relevant point of time for AY 2017-18 and therefore, the amended provision denying the depreciation on goodwill which came into effect from 01.04.2021 could not have formed the basis for re-opening to come to the conclusion that there is escapement of income by claiming of depreciation on goodwill.

The appellant/assessee company has created goodwill of Rs.11,00,000 on slump sale and claimed depreciation on the same in its ITR and Tax Audit Report. The Tax Auditor has reported in tax audit report that the assessee has made addition in block of intangible assets to the tune of Rs.4,29,94,061 which is inclusive of amount of goodwill of Rs.11,02,868/-.

Read More: Section 148 Can’t Be Invoked For Change In Tax Rate For Future AYs: Bombay High Court

The Assessing Officer on the basis of the material available on record has prima facie come to the conclusion that there is escapement of income as the issue of foreign profit/loss was not at all considered by the then Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer in the reasons for re-opening has categorically observed that escapement of income is mainly on wrong claim of depreciation on goodwill.

The petitioner/assessee has challenged the reassessment proceedings on the grounds that thenotice for re-opening was based on mere change of opinion as the case of the petitioner was selected for scrutiny and issues on hand were examined at the original assessment stage by the then Assessing Officer and relied upon the reply filed by the petitioner in response to the notice.

The court held that the Assessing Officer could not have assumed the jurisdiction to re-open the assessment. The notice issued under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is quashed and set aside. 

Case Details

Case Title: GTPL Hathway Limited Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 2(1)(1) & Anr.

Case No.: R/Special Civil Application No. 2437 Of 2022

Date: 03/02/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Tushar Hemani, Senior Advocate With
Ms Vaibhavi K Parikh

Counsel For Respondent: Varun K.Patel

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at JurisHour. She has 5+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies like LiveLaw & Taxscan.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

GST Weekly Flashback: 16 to 22 February 2025 

Goods and Service Tax (GST) Weekly Flashback for the...

BREAKING | BCI Welcomes Govt’s Decision To Revise Advocates (Amendment) Bill 2025

The Bar Council of India (CBI) has welcomed the...

Shaktikanta Das Appointed Principal Secretary to PM Modi: Former RBI Governor Takes Key Role

Former RBI Governor and retired IAS officer Shaktikanta Das...

This Is Why Bombay High Court Quashes Income Tax Reassessment Against Indusind Media 

The Bombay High Court has quashed the  income tax reassessment...