12% GST On Fruit Pulp, Juice-Based Carbonated Drinks: Gauhati High Court

Date:

The Gauhati High Court has held that the Fruit pulp, juice-based carbonated drinks are not ‘akin’ to ‘water’ and attract 12% GST and not 28% GST.

The bench of Justice Soumitra Saikia has observed that carbonated fruit drinks and ready to serve fruit drinks are classifiable under Tariff Item 2202 99 20 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and are specified as serial No.48 under Schedule-II as “fruit pulp or fruit juice based drinks” in notification No.1 of 2017 – Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and are taxable at the rate of 12%.

The petitioner/assessee, X’SS Beverage Co. is in the business of manufacture and sale of carbonated fruit drinks and ready to serve fruit drinks. The petitioner is a partnership firm and is represented in the present proceedings by the Managing partner. 

The assessee contended that carbonated beverages with fruit drinks should not have less than 10% fruit juice (5% in case of lime or lemon) and total soluble solids not less than 10% as per Regulation 2.3.30 of Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulation, 2011. 

The petitioner contended that these carbonated fruit drinks qualify as fruit beverages or fruit drinks. It is the case of the petitioner that the products manufactured by the petitioner are regularly tested at the State Public Health Laboratory, Government of Assam where sample products are sent for testing.

From the report of analysis of food sample, it is clear that goods supplied by the petitioner comprises of fruit juice content more than 10% solids, sugar (sucrose) acidity regulators and synthetic food colors and it confirms to the specifications stipulated in Regulation 2.3.30 of FSSAI for carbonated beverage with fruit juice. All particulars including the details of the fruit concentrate are described on the label of the respective products.

According to the petitioner, carbonated beverages with fruit drinks should not have less than 10% fruit juice (5% in case of lime or lemon) and total soluble solids not less than 10% as per Regulation 2.3.30 of Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulation, 2011. According to the petitioner, these carbonated fruit drinks qualify as fruit beverages or fruit drinks. 

It is the case of the petitioner that the products manufactured by the petitioner are regularly tested at the State Public Health Laboratory, Government of Assam where sample products are sent for testing. From the report of analysis of food sample, it is clear that goods supplied by the petitioner comprises of fruit juice content more than 10% solids, sugar (sucrose) acidity regulators and synthetic food colors and it confirms to the specifications stipulated in Regulation 2.3.30 of FSSAI for carbonated beverage with fruit juice. That apart, all particulars including the details of the fruit concentrate are described on the label of the respective products.

On the basis of the classification adopted by the petitioner, it filed the GST returns regularly upon payment of appropriate taxes at the rate of 12%. The classifications of the products were duly described in the invoices raised and the returns filed by the petitioner.

The department contended that since the products manufactured and sold by the petitioner contains carbonated water along with added sugar or sweetening matter or flavor, the goods are to be covered under HSN 2202 10 90 and are liable to be taxed at 28% GST along with cess at the rate of 12%. 

The court while allowing the writ petition held that fruit juice based drink were also to be covered by aerated branded soft drink, there was no occasion for the subordinate authorities to include the said products in Notification under Section 6(1)(d).

Case Details

Case Title: X’SS Beverage Co. Versus State Of Assam

Case No.: W.P(C) NO. 5347/2022

Date: 04.03.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: A. Saraf, Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr. P.K. Bora

Counsel For Respondent: B. Gogoi, SC, Finance & Taxation

Read More: Peeyush Jain Posted As CCIT (OSD), CBDT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at JurisHour. She has 5+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies like LiveLaw & Taxscan.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Paying Rent To Parents, Unlock HRA Tax Benefits & Save Big – Here’s How!

Claiming House Rent Allowance (HRA) exemption is a significant...

No GST On Govt. Consultancy Services: AAAR

The Gujarat Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR) has...

CESTAT Upholds Service Tax On Renting Of Immovable Property

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax...

Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against Man Caught With Live Ammunition at IGI Airport: Know Why?

The Delhi High Court has quashed the First Information...