HomeGSTGovt. Notifies State Branches Of GSTATĀ 

Govt. Notifies State Branches Of GSTATĀ 

Published on

šŸš€ Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Ministry of Finance has notified 29 branches of the Goods and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT).

The government in exercise of the powers conferred under section 109 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and on the recommendation of the Goods and Services Tax Council established the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), with effect from the 1st September, 2023.

The notification announced that the Principal Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) at will be at New Delhi.

Many people have raised concern that Vijayawada is the capital of Andhra Pradesh, centrally located to establish GST Tribunal. How Visakhapatnam is comfortable to either consultants or business men. Every Advocate is having office at Vijayawada. No one has expected Tribunal to be at Visakhapatnam.

The government constituted the number of State Benches of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal with respect to the State at the location with the Sitting or Circuit Bench which are as follows: 

F. No. A-50050/150/2018-CESTAT-DoR

Download Notification

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ā€˜Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

Vendor Non-Response Alone Can’t Justify Denial of Business Expenditure: ITAT Remands Rs. 40.63 Crore Expense Disallowance

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...

CBDT Circular Denying Tax Relief to Judges Under New Tax Regime Questioned: Delhi HC Stays Processing of Judges’ ITRs

The Delhi High Court has prima facie held that statutory allowances granted to High...

Forex Hedging Gains on Cancellation of Forward Contracts Are Capital Gains, Not ā€˜Income From Other Sources’: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that gains...

No Motor Accident Compensation Without Proven Link Between Death and Use of Vehicle: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act cannot be...

More like this

Vendor Non-Response Alone Can’t Justify Denial of Business Expenditure: ITAT Remands Rs. 40.63 Crore Expense Disallowance

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...

CBDT Circular Denying Tax Relief to Judges Under New Tax Regime Questioned: Delhi HC Stays Processing of Judges’ ITRs

The Delhi High Court has prima facie held that statutory allowances granted to High...

Forex Hedging Gains on Cancellation of Forward Contracts Are Capital Gains, Not ā€˜Income From Other Sources’: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that gains...