Orissa High Court Quashes Increased Tax Demand Against Coca Cola 

Date:

The Orissa High Court has quashed the increased tax demand against Coca Cola.

The bench of Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice M.S. Sahoo has observed that an amendment, which has the effect of enhancing an assessment or otherwise increasing liability of the assessee shall not be made unless the authority has given notice to the assessee of its intention to do so and has allowed the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

The bench added that if there has been an increase in the amount of interest by the rectification, petitioner was entitled to a notice for being heard. The concept of aggregate demand remaining the same is not supported by the provision.

The petitioner/assessee, Hindustan Coca Cola has challenged intimation intimating that the Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax (Appeal), in its appeal had dismissed the appeal. The petitioner then became liable to pay tax and interest within 15 days of receipt, failing which recovery proceeding will be initiated. 

The assessee stated that the appeal order was never communicated. 

The department contended that the order is one of rectification made to order. It having been disclosed in the writ petition is demonstration that petitioner was communicated the rectification order, subject matter of the intimation.

The mention of appeal order gives no.3623 and date 21st October, 2023. It carries error inasmuch as the rectification of appeal order is order no.3623 dated 21st October, 2024. The order reference has been correctly stated in the intimation but the date carries a mistake. 

The department committed error, albeit typographical error in printing date of the order mentioned in impugned intimation. Petitioner’s contention is that the order mentioned in impugned intimation was not served. It could not have been as the particulars of the order themselves carry an error. However, we are convinced that the petitioner was aware all along.

The court quashed the rectification order and the intimation. 

Read More: GST Council Recommendation Not A Precondition For Issuing  S. 168A Notification: Telangana High Court

Case Details

Case Title: M/s. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., Versus The Commissioner, CT and GST Odisha, Cuttack and others

Case No.: W.P.(C) No.32208 of 2024

Date: 09/01/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: K.R. Choudhury

Counsel For Respondent: S. Mishra

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at JurisHour. She has 5+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies like LiveLaw & Taxscan.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

JOB VACANCY | Gujarat Income Tax Dept. Invites Advocates For Post Of Special Public Prosecutors

Applications are invited from practicing advocates, having experience in...

Delhi High Court Clarifies On Surviving Time Period For Income Tax Reassessment Notice

The Delhi High Court has clarified on the surviving...

THE JAN VISHWAS ACT, 2023: A STEP TOWARDS DECRIMINALIZATION AND REGULATORY REFORM

This Article pertaining to THE JAN VISHWAS ACT, 2023:...