Supply Of Advertising Services Not  “Intermediary” Services Under IGST Act, Clarifies CBIC

Date:

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that the supply of advertising services is not  “intermediary” services under Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act (IGST).

The Board has clarified that the advertising company is involved in the main supply of advertising services, including resale of media space, to the foreign client on principal-to-principal basis as detailed above and does not fulfil the criteria of “intermediary” under section 2(13) of the IGST Act. Thus, it cannot be considered as “intermediary”. The place of supply in the instant matter cannot be linked with the location of the supplier of services in terms of section 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act.

The Board has received references from the trade and industry requesting for clarification regarding advertising services being provided by Indian advertising companies/agencies to foreign entities, as some of the field formations are considering the place of supply of the services as within India, by denying the export benefits to advertising companies.

A foreign company or firm hires an advertising company/agency in India for advertisement of its goods or services and may enter into a comprehensive agreement with the advertising company/agency encompassing all the issues related to advertising services ranging from media planning, investment planning for the same, creating and designing content, strategizing for maximum customer reach, the identification of media owners, dealing with media owners, procuring media space, etc. for displaying/broadcasting/printing of advertisement including monitoring of the progress of the same. In such a case, the advertising agency provides a one stop solution to the client who outsources the entire activity to the agency.

Media owners raise invoices to the advertising agency for inventory costs, which are then paid by the advertising agency. Subsequently, the advertising agency raises invoice to the foreign client for the rendered advertising services and receives the payments in foreign exchange from the foreign client. 

Issue Raised – Whether advertising company can be considered as an “intermediary” between the foreign client and the media owners in terms of section 2(13) of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 resulting in determination of place of supply under section 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act?

As per section 2(13) of IGST Act, read with Circular no. 159/15/2021-GST dated 20.09.2021, a broker, agent or any other person who arranges or facilitates the main supply of goods or services or both or securities and has not involved himself in the main supply on his own account is considered as intermediary.

In the instant scenario, it is observed that the foreign clients enter into a comprehensive agreement with advertising companies/agencies in India and outsource the entire activity of advertising services to the advertising companies/agencies. These advertising companies/agencies enter into an agreement with the media owners in India for implementing the said media plan and procurement of media space for airing or releasing or printing advertisement.

The advertising agency, enters into two agreements.

Firstly, with the client located outside India for providing a one stop solution starting from designing the advertisement to its display in the media as agreed to with the client. The advertising company raises invoice to its foreign client for the above advertising services and the payments of the same is received from the foreign client in foreign exchange.

Secondly, with the media company to procure media space for display of the advertisement and to monitor campaign progress based on data shared by the media company. The media company bills the advertising agency and the payment for the same is made by the advertising agency to the media company.

The agreement, in the instant case, is in the nature of two distinct principal-to-principal supplies and no agreement of supply of services exists between the Media company and the foreign client. The advertising company is not acting as an agent but has been contracted by the client to procure and provide certain services. The advertising agency is providing the services to the client on its own account.

Circular No. 230/24/2024-GST

Date: 10/09/2024

Read Circular

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at JurisHour. She has 5+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies like LiveLaw & Taxscan.

Share post:

Popular

More like this
Related

Indirect Taxes Weekly Flashback: 16 December 2024 to 22 December 2024  

Indirect Taxes Weekly Flashback for the period 16 December...

Income Tax Weekly Flashback: 16 December 2024 to 22 December 2024  

Income Tax Weekly Flashback for the period 16 December...

First Day Bail Within Few Hours Of Arrest To Accused Involved In Wrongful ITC Availment : ACJM Terms Arrest Illegal

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mumbai has granted bail...